4 Comments
User's avatar
Emily Kerr's avatar

I think they should have had a separate list for nonfiction. Nonfiction really was snubbed. I agree with you about authors with multiple books on the list. I would have preferred just one title per person and then maybe we would have seen McBride and Erdrich.

Expand full comment
Alicia McClintic's avatar

I agree about separating fiction and nonfiction— I think trying to do both is just too broad!

Expand full comment
Mary Rogovin's avatar

I love your thoughts on the framing for your selections, and your list vibrates with mine like a true friend - we don't share any titles, but we both have Louise Erdrich, and many of your books were contenders for my list (I haven't read Mecca or Sag Harbor, but I will! (I don't know Canva, so I had to create my list on Goodreads like a dinosaur https://www.goodreads.com/review/list/185535-mary?ref=nav_mybooks&shelf=my-best-of-21st-century ) Also, I read 43 of the NYT list, and a couple of those were total duds for me (like I will never again pick up Franzen!) so I'm holding the list VERY lightly and mostly celebrating the community connections the whole thing fostered. because we needed some collective joy.

Expand full comment
Alicia McClintic's avatar

Oh I totally agree, Mary! Here for the joyous conversation! (And I kind of wish there was a “definitely don’t want to read this” button haha)

Expand full comment